The full route light takes from the retina to the cortex, then splits into the "what / where" streams — plus one counterintuitive fact: the brain sends more signal "down" this path than it sends "up."
Vision isn't a single step of "the eye sees → the brain knows." The signal passes several stations, and every one re-encodes rather than simply forwarding:
Two organizing principles that run through the whole pathway:
Receptive field — each visual neuron only "watches" a small patch of the visual field. Low levels have a center-surround structure (excited when the center is bright and the surround dark), which is naturally an edge/contrast detector; the higher you go, the larger and more abstract the receptive field becomes (from edges → shapes → objects → faces). This hierarchy of "small receptive fields stacking into large ones, simple features combining into complex ones" is exactly the biological prototype of convolutional networks.
Retinotopy — adjacent positions in the visual field are adjacent on the cortex too. The brain literally lays "space" out as a map; many sensory systems use this kind of "topology-preserving" mapping (hearing is tonotopic, somatosensation is body-topographic).
The point most easily simplified away in textbooks, and the most important: in the visual pathway, the number of feedback (top-down) connections exceeds that of feedforward (bottom-up) connections. That 90% of LGN input comes from the cortex is the plainest evidence. It means the brain is mainly "sending predictions" toward the senses rather than passively receiving — this anatomical fact is the physical bedrock of the whole "perception as inference / predictive processing" framework.
Topic 1 Perception as Inference · Topic 2 Attention (thalamic gating) · future issues on visual/sensory systems
Hubel & Wiesel · orientation selectivity (Nobel-winning work) · Goodale & Milner · the two-streams hypothesis · Receptive field · Retinotopy