DEEP READING · READ 63

Ulysses

James Joyce · 1922

中文 →

In one sentence

Joyce takes eighteen hours in the life of a Dublin advertising canvasser — from the kidney he fries for breakfast on 16 June 1904 to the bed he climbs into that night — lays them over the skeleton of the Odyssey, and writes each hour in a different prose style, in order to prove one thing: the epic did not disappear, it was broken up and handed out, one share to every unremarkable person on every day when nothing happens.

Coordinates

James Joyce (1882–1941) left Dublin at twenty-two and spent the rest of his life in Trieste, Zurich and Paris — and wrote about nothing but Dublin. Ulysses was printed in Paris by Sylvia Beach of Shakespeare and Company on 2 February 1922, Joyce's fortieth birthday, after one of its chapters had been ruled obscene during American magazine serialisation and the book banned; it took Judge John M. Woolsey's 1933 decision to let it into the United States. It is the watershed of the modern novel: everything written afterwards either builds on it or has to explain why it doesn't.

The core claims

One: the epic has been redistributed. Homer's hero earns his meaning through slaughter and wandering. Joyce's claim is that the same capacity now sits inside a middle-aged cuckold who sells advertising space — his wandering is a day's walk across a city, and his victory is that he does not hit back.

Two: consciousness is not finished thought but a permanent low roar. Novels before this one reported what a character thought — conclusions already tidied into sentences. Joyce writes the layer underneath: half-words, jump cuts, an association broken off by a passing cart. The subject of fiction shifts from what happened to where the attention went.

Three: there is no neutral prose. The book changes technique every chapter, and this is not showmanship, it is the argument. Style is not a garment the content wears; style decides what the content is allowed to be. Write Dublin another way and you get another Dublin — and "plain objective description" is simply one style pretending it isn't one.

The core concepts, one at a time

1. Stream of consciousness: not what you say to yourself, but the mess before the words line up

Stream of consciousness is William James's phrase for the fact that the mind is not a string of beads but a river that never stops moving. Joyce turned it into a technique — interior monologue: drop the "he thought," drop the explanation, and set down the fragments in the order they surface.

Three mechanics do the work. Cut the subjects and connectives — nobody says to themselves "I am now noticing that this cheese is unusually pungent"; what flashes past is "Sharp. Cheese." Allow interruption — a man is thinking about his dead father, a cart goes by, the thought jumps to the wheel and back, and the missing stretch never returns. Braid the senses into memory — the light on a shopfront and an afternoon twenty years gone appear in the same clause, neither yielding to the other.

Take Bloom in the funeral carriage on the way to Glasnevin. The traditional way to write this is grief. What Joyce writes is a man pricing coffins, noticing the mud on someone's boot, remembering the son who died eleven days old, thinking about the man his wife is expecting at four o'clock, and feeling faintly ashamed of thinking any of it at a funeral. Sorrow is not one solid thing; it comes chopped up by trivia, and the chopping is its actual shape.

Why it matters: until then the novel assumed a mind could be summarised — the author standing behind the character, tidying the feeling into a readable paragraph. Joyce fired the middleman. The cost is difficulty, since you are handed unprocessed material. The gain is that someone finally wrote down what is actually going on in a person's head when nobody is watching.

How it changes your seeing: you notice your own mind is not a coherent monologue but a crowd of fragments interrupting each other, most of them irrelevant to whatever you are doing. That is not a defect; that is the normal condition. Concentration is not the removal of the noise but the maintenance of one thread through it.

2. The mythical method: laying the whole Odyssey over an ad salesman

The eighteen chapters map one by one onto Homer. Odysseus — Ulysses in Latin — becomes Leopold Bloom, thirty-eight, canvassing advertisements for a Dublin newspaper. Telemachus, the son searching for his father, becomes Stephen Dedalus, twenty-two. Penelope, who held out for twenty years, becomes Bloom's wife Molly, who this afternoon at four o'clock does not hold out at all. The Cyclops is a one-eyed nationalist in a pub, the Sirens are two barmaids at a hotel counter, Circe's island is a brothel in the red-light district.

T. S. Eliot named the procedure in 1923: the mythical method — "manipulating a continuous parallel between contemporaneity and antiquity," which he called "a way of controlling, of ordering, of giving a shape and a significance to the immense panorama of futility and anarchy which is contemporary history" (paraphrased). That sentence exposes the mechanism. The myth here is not decoration, it is a coordinate grid. The events of an ordinary day have no inherent sizes — breakfast and adultery take up the same amount of clock. Lay Homer over them and each one acquires a position: this is the descent to the underworld, that is the passage of the Sirens. Only then do they have magnitudes.

What matters is that the parallel pulls in both directions at once. Upward: it insists Bloom deserves this treatment, that a Jewish adman insulted to his face carries a day as weighty as the sack of Troy. Downward: it deflates the epic — Odysseus shoots the suitors dead, and Bloom's response is to lie down, absorb it, and go to sleep. The two are not in tension; they are one judgement seen from two sides. The content of heroism has changed. It is no longer conquest. It is endurance, curiosity, and unfashionable kindness.

How it changes your seeing: once you have watched someone grid a day this way, it is hard to go back to calling your own days empty. The meeting, the commute, being overruled in public, cooking dinner — these are not the opposite of epic. Nobody has drawn them a coordinate system.

3. One day: the whole bet placed on nothing happening

Why 16 June 1904? Because that was the day Joyce first walked out alone with Nora Barnacle, who became his wife. He handed the most important day of his private life to a completely invented ordinary man — and readers now dress as Bloom and walk the route every year, on what the world calls Bloomsday.

The single day is the wager: no rise and fall of plot, only density. A conventional novel accumulates weight by crossing decades or generations. Joyce bets that if the record of one day is thorough enough, the weight will grow by itself. So he writes Bloom frying a pork kidney with its faint tang of urine, which Bloom likes; writes him on the toilet; writes him masturbating on a beach; writes his friends mocking him behind his back; writes him spending the whole day steering around his own front door. None of that is transgression for its own sake — it is structurally necessary. Leave the body out and the day is no longer a whole day, and the bet is lost.

Joyce told a friend, in a much-quoted remark (paraphrased), that he wanted Dublin so completely written that if the city vanished it could be rebuilt from the book. The boast reveals the method: he wrote it in exile, from memory, from letters to relatives, and from a 1904 Dublin street-and-trades directory used to check which shop stood on which corner. The other half of stream of consciousness turns out to be something close to bookkeeping.

How it changes your seeing: you start to distrust the category "important events." On what authority do promotions, weddings and deaths count as content while ten minutes of drifting at a bus stop does not? The second kind is what your day is actually made of.

4. Eighteen styles: the book's real protagonist

Through the first ten chapters the voice is broadly stable. After that Joyce changes technique every chapter, and every technique grows out of that chapter's subject:

Why it matters: a novel with one "normal" style lets the reader mistake that style for clear glass. Set eighteen side by side and the glass appears. Every manner of writing has already decided for you what will be visible and what will not. Newspaper prose turns the world into competing headlines; the catechism turns a man into measurable data; the ladies'-magazine idiom turns a glance across a beach into syrup. Which one is true? That is the conclusion the book makes you undergo rather than telling you.

How it changes your seeing: from then on you read a report, a news item or a company email and see its genre before you see its content — and the genre has usually settled the conclusion already.

5. Paternity as a legal fiction: two gaps that fit

The plot fits in a sentence: two strangers circle a city all day, fall in together near midnight, drink a cup of cocoa, and part. That thin line carries the book's heaviest theme.

Bloom had a son, Rudy, who died eleven days old; in the eleven years since, he and his wife have not had a complete marriage. Stephen has a father and refuses to acknowledge him; his mother has just died, and he is trapped in guilt for refusing to kneel and pray at her bedside. A father who lost his son, a son who won't have a father. In the library chapter Stephen performs his perverse theory of Hamlet: Shakespeare wrote the play from the ghost's side, not the prince's — he is the dead father, demanding to be remembered. In the middle of it comes the book's central line (paraphrased): "Paternity may be a legal fiction."

A legal fiction is a real term of art: something known not to be factually true but treated as true so the system can work — the way a company is treated as a person able to sign contracts. Applying it to blood, Stephen means that fatherhood has no biological certainty behind it, only a relation that gets acknowledged again and again. Which leaves the book a door: if paternity was always a fiction, then a Jewish adman and an Irish graduate can become father and son for one night by agreement.

And Joyce refuses to walk through it. Stephen declines the bed, the two men urinate in the back garden, look at the stars, and Stephen walks off, probably for good. This is the most modern stroke in the book: it assembles every ingredient of reconciliation and then withholds the reconciliation. The point is not that they will now save each other. The point is that the cocoa was actually made.

How it changes your seeing: you start to reconsider the unnamed relationships in your own life — the older colleague who covered for you once, the person you worked beside for half a year. Kinship doesn't come from blood. It comes from someone, at a particular hour, making you the cocoa.

6. Bloom's ethics: saying "love" to the Cyclops

At five in the afternoon Bloom walks into a pub and runs into a nationalist known only as the Citizen — the book's Cyclops. The single eye is a precise joke: with one eye there is no depth perception, so everything looks flat. He can see "Irishmen" and "foreigners"; he cannot see the particular man standing in front of him.

Pressed to say what nation he belongs to, Bloom answers with something close to clumsiness (paraphrased): "A nation is the same people living in the same place." Laughed at, he adds: "Or also living in different places." He is himself the exception — his father was a Hungarian Jew who converted and later killed himself; Bloom was baptised, which makes him a Jew to the Irish and not quite a Jew to the Jews. He is everyone's outsider. Then he states the book's ethical core (paraphrased): "Force, hatred, history, all that. That's not life for men and women. And everybody knows that it's the very opposite of that that is really life." Asked what the opposite is, he says: love.

The line is punished on the spot. The pub jeers, the Citizen hurls a biscuit tin after him, and Bloom flees in a jaunting car. Joyce does not let the sentence win, which is precisely why it is credible. Had the room fallen silent in respect, the book would be a sermon. Because a tin gets thrown, "love" stops being a slogan and becomes the entire holding a man can produce under hostility.

Why it matters: Europe in 1922 had just finished four years of war and Ireland was in civil war. Putting a Jewish clerk who doesn't fight back in the hero's slot is itself a political verdict: the answer to tribalism is not a better tribe but awkward, badly timed, eminently mockable particular kindness.

7. Molly's Yes: the last vote, cast by the body

The final chapter belongs to Molly, who has spent the day in bed and barely appeared. Forty-odd pages, eight enormous sentences without a single mark of punctuation: lying beside her husband's feet she runs the adultery, her girlhood in Gibraltar, her husband's absurdity and his sweetness, old lovers, money and God through her mind all mixed together.

Why must this chapter exist? Because the previous seventeen are almost entirely male minds — Stephen's theology and aesthetics, Bloom's popular-science curiosity, the politics and boasting of the pub — all of them consciousness already worked over by language. Molly's chapter has no punctuation, which means no segmentation, no ranking, no syntactic hierarchy: everything weighs the same, because that is how the body files things. It is a correction applied to the whole book, dragging seventeen chapters of speculation back down to flesh and memory.

The last sentence lands on the afternoon Bloom proposed to her on Howth Head, in a run of yeses (paraphrased: "yes I said yes I will Yes"). Note that other men drift through the memory as she recalls the proposal. The "yes" is not a reconciliation with the marriage, nor an answer addressed to Bloom. It is an assent to life itself. Nothing in the day has been fixed: the adultery happened, the son is still dead, the father and son did not adopt each other. And the last word of the book is Yes. That is the whole of Joyce's conclusion: you don't have to wait for things to improve before agreeing to them.

How it changes your seeing: we tend to imagine acceptance as the result of working something out. Molly's chapter says the reverse — acceptance is not a conclusion you reason your way to; the body says yes first and the mind catches up later.

The argument in outline: how the day gets spent

Three movements, matching Homer. Chapters 1–3, the search for a father: Stephen, eight to eleven in the morning. Chapters 4–15, the wandering: the clock resets to eight and we follow Bloom through the entire day. Chapters 16–18, the homecoming: the small hours. The two lines brush past each other several times — from the funeral carriage, at the library door — and do not properly meet until ten at night.

8:00 12:00 16:00 22:00 2:00 Stephen (tower → school → strand → newspaper → library) Bloom (home → funeral → lunch → pub → strand → hospital) near-miss at the library they meet at the hospital → Nighttown cocoa · parting 16:00 Boylan enters 7 Eccles Street — the only event, and it happens offstage

Schematic: the two lines barely intersect all day. The book's weight sits inside each of them.

The beats: Bloom fries the kidney, carries up his wife's breakfast, and sees the letter from Boylan — from that moment he knows what four o'clock holds, and spends the day walking around his own house. Late morning, the funeral. Noon, the newspaper office, where language is cut into headlines. Lunch is a gorgonzola sandwich and a glass of burgundy. Two o'clock, the library and the Hamlet theory. Four o'clock, songs at the hotel bar while Boylan's car rolls towards Eccles Street. Five, the pub and the Citizen. Eight, a girl seen from a distance on the strand. Ten, Stephen at the maternity hospital. Midnight, collapse in the brothel and Bloom picking him up off the floor. Then home, cocoa, and separate sleep.

What does the book prove? That a day in which nothing occurs can still fill a very large novel — and it proves it with three instruments: density (the raw material of consciousness served unprocessed), structure (Homer's grid assigning positions to trivia), and formal self-awareness (eighteen styles letting you watch language manufacture reality). Of plot it keeps the bare minimum: a man knows he is being betrayed, walks all day, goes home, lies down, and does not retaliate. The climax of the book is a thing that fails to happen.

The eighteen chapters: Homeric parallel, hour and place, and the technique of each (following the schema Joyce circulated privately)
#HomerHour · placeTechnique
1Telemachus8am · Martello tower, SandycoveOrdinary narrative, young voice
2Nestor10am · the schoolQuestion and answer; a history lesson
3Proteus11am · Sandymount StrandPure interior monologue — the hardest chapter
4Calypso8am · 7 Eccles StreetNarrative, mature voice; the book restarts
5Lotus Eaters10am · streets, bathsDrifting, narcotic, led by smells
6Hades11am · Glasnevin CemeteryNightmare; death keeps interrupting
7AeolusNoon · newspaper officeText diced by headlines
8Lestrygonians1pm · lunch, Davy Byrne'sPeristaltic — sentences push like a gut
9Scylla and Charybdis2pm · National LibraryDialectic: the Hamlet argument
10Wandering Rocks3pm · the whole cityLabyrinth: nineteen scenes cross-cut
11Sirens4pm · Ormond hotel barFugue by canon; prose turns into music
12Cyclops5pm · Barney Kiernan'sAnonymous sneering voice × wild parodic inserts
13Nausicaa8pm · the strandGirls'-magazine syrup, then back to Bloom
14Oxen of the Sun10pm · maternity hospitalThe history of English prose, Old English to slang
15CirceMidnight · NighttownHallucinatory playscript; the longest chapter
16Eumaeus1am · cabman's shelterExhausted, padded, drowning in cliché
17Ithaca2am · 7 Eccles StreetCatechism: pitiless question and answer
18PenelopeNight · the bedEight unpunctuated sentences, ending in Yes

Common misreadings, and the real objections

Misreading 1: you must decode every allusion before you are entitled to read it. The opposite. Joyce stripped the Homeric chapter titles out of the finished book — "Calypso," "Sirens" and the rest come from a schema he passed around privately and appear nowhere in the text. He wanted it read first as one man's day. Bloom hungry, Bloom embarrassed, Bloom aroused, Bloom kind: none of that needs a footnote. The allusions are for the second reading.

Misreading 2: it has no plot, so it is an experiment rather than a novel. The plot is minimal but real, and entirely traditional: a man knows his wife will be unfaithful this afternoon and decides not to prevent it; a young man has lost the place where a father should be; the two meet and separate. What is omitted is not the plot but its dramatisation.

Misreading 3: stream of consciousness means writing whatever comes. It is one of the most heavily calculated novels of the century — each chapter tied to an organ of the body, a discipline, a colour and a technique, the timeline accurate to the minute, the walking distances checked against a 1904 directory. Every ounce of its looseness was computed.

Misreading 4: Molly's "yes" means the marriage is saved. Nothing suggests tomorrow will differ. The yes is said to life, not delivered as a verdict on a marriage.

Misreading 5: it is a documentary record of 1904 Dublin. It was written between 1914 and 1921 in Trieste, Zurich and Paris — a city reconstructed by an exile out of memory and research. This is a Dublin longed for, not a Dublin recorded.

The strongest objections, stated at full strength:

1. Does the technique drown the man? Virginia Woolf was blunt in her diary (paraphrased): an illiterate, underbred book, the book of a self-taught working man. She was writing her own stream-of-consciousness novels at the time, so this is not merely a clash of taste but a real question — when the formal performance gets this loud, how much attention is left over for Bloom? She softened later; the objection stands.

2. Does it crown itself by being difficult? Joyce half-joked (paraphrased) that he had put in so many puzzles and enigmas that the professors would be busy for centuries. The remark is usually quoted as praise; it can be read the other way. A book that requires an academic industry to stay readable has permanently excluded some of its readers. Honestly: most first-time readers cannot get through chapters 3 and 14, and there is no point pretending otherwise.

3. The political attack. At the 1934 Soviet Writers' Congress, Karl Radek dismissed it (paraphrased) as a heap of dung crawling with worms, photographed by a cinema camera through a microscope — meaning that to aim the lens at one small man's guts and daydreams is to make a microscopic defence of a world that ought to be overthrown. The charge grates now, but it forces a real question: is shrinking politics to a single person's day a deepening or an evasion?

4. Is Molly's chapter liberation or male fantasy? Jung wrote to Joyce (paraphrased) that the devil's grandmother could hardly know more about the psychology of a woman. The counter-reading is just as strong: the one woman granted a full interior arrives last, in bed, thinking mostly about men and about her body. Is this the first frank rendering of female desire, or a woman locked into the position of "flesh"? Both sides have evidence.

5. Even the text is unstable. Serialisation banned, manuscripts scattered, a first edition set by compositors who did not read English — the printed Ulysses has always swarmed with errors. Hans Walter Gabler's 1984 critical edition claimed thousands of corrections and was promptly attacked by the scholar John Kidd over its editorial principles, in the row known as the Scandal of Ulysses. The result is that no single text of the book commands universal assent.

Beyond this book: the rest of Joyce

Joyce wrote four books that matter, and they form one accelerating line. Read only the middle one and you will misjudge him.

Dubliners (1914) is fifteen stories on a single theme, and the word for it is paralysis: Dubliners who mean to leave and never do. Here he invented the instrument he used for life — the epiphany. The word originally means the showing-forth of divinity; Joyce secularised it to mean the instant when an ordinary object or overheard remark suddenly lights up and reveals a person's whole situation. The last story, "The Dead," is its peak: a man learns that his wife once loved a boy who stood in the rain for her and died of it, and stands at the window watching snow fall over all Ireland. The epiphanies survive into Ulysses, scattered through a single day, often comic and usually interrupted.

A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man (1916) is the prehistory of the Stephen we meet here: how he refuses family, nation and church in turn, says non serviam — I will not serve — and elects silence, exile and cunning as his only weapons (paraphrased). It also sets out Joyce's aesthetic: the artist should stay behind the work "like the God of creation, paring his fingernails" (paraphrased) — no explaining, no judging, no appearing. The author of Ulysses, who will not tidy anyone's feelings for you, is that sentence made good. And note what happens between the books: the Stephen who ends Portrait in triumph is back in Dublin, shabby and stuck, by Ulysses. Joyce demolished his own youthful self-portrait without mercy.

Finnegans Wake (1939) took his last seventeen years and is where this road ends. If Ulysses is the language of the day, the Wake is the language of the night: dream-words fused together, each one several words in several languages at once. The whole book is said to be a single night's dream, bent by Giambattista Vico's cyclical theory of history (Vico was an eighteenth-century Italian thinker) into a closed ring — the last sentence breaks off and runs into the first page. It is close to unreadable, but it marks the bearing: Joyce spent his life moving deeper into language, and Ulysses is the last stop where he was still willing to remain among people.

Ten sentences

1. The epic didn't disappear; it was broken up and handed out, one share per person per day. Homer's hero spends twenty years of wandering to get a home back; Bloom spends eighteen hours avoiding one — same weight, only nobody had ever drawn the ordinary man a coordinate grid.

2. Fiction's subject moved from what happened to where the attention went. What you actually live through in a day is not the three important events but the drifting, the flashes, the interrupted associations — this is the first book to serve that raw material unprocessed.

3. Style is not a garment the content wears; style decides what the content can be. Eighteen manners of writing take turns so that you see it for yourself: "objective description" is one style pretending it isn't one.

4. "Paternity may be a legal fiction" (paraphrased). Kinship rests not on the certainty of blood but on a relation repeatedly acknowledged — so an ad canvasser and a young graduate can be father and son for one night, and then walk away from each other.

5. "A nation is the same people living in the same place" (paraphrased). Bloom's definition, offered to a hostile room, is endearingly clumsy — and it refuses to sort people into us and them. It costs him a biscuit tin thrown at his head.

6. "Force, hatred, history — that's not life for men and women; everybody knows the very opposite of that is really life" (paraphrased). The opposite is love. The pub jeers him for saying it, which is exactly what makes it credible: not a slogan, just everything one man has on him under hostility.

7. The climax is a thing that fails to happen: he doesn't hit back. Odysseus shoots every suitor; Bloom knows, absorbs it, goes home, lies down and sleeps. The new heroism isn't conquest — it's endurance, curiosity, and ill-timed kindness.

8. Be honest about the hard parts, and about the easy ones. Two or three chapters will defeat almost anyone. It also contains one of the most companionable characters in literature — a middle-aged man who gets hungry, gets embarrassed, and after a day of humiliation still buys a book to bring home to his wife.

9. Write a city thoroughly enough and it could be rebuilt from the book (paraphrased) — and the irony is that this city was rebuilt abroad, out of memory and a trades directory, by an exile who never went back. What gets written in the finest detail is usually what can't be returned to.

10. "Yes I said yes I will Yes" (paraphrased) — nothing in the day was resolved, and the last word of the book is Yes. You don't have to wait for things to get better before agreeing to them; acceptance isn't a conclusion you reason out — the body says yes first and the mind follows.